feat: add CITrigger interface #64
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @lanmaoxinqing, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the CI triggering logic by introducing a Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a CITrigger interface to abstract the continuous integration trigger logic, which is a great improvement for modularity and testability. The implementation is decoupled from the controller and made configurable via command-line flags. The changes are well-structured and the new interface is clearly defined. I've added one suggestion to improve the configuration handling by adding a warning for incomplete configuration, which will enhance usability and prevent silent failures.
I am having trouble creating individual review comments. Click here to see my feedback.
envhub/main.go (91-96)
The CI trigger is configured only when both template-id and callback-url are provided. If a user specifies only one of these optional flags, the trigger is silently disabled. This can lead to configuration errors that are hard to debug. It's better to log a warning message in this case to alert the user.
if templateId != "" && callbackURL != "" {
ciTrigger = clients.ACITrigger{
TemplateId: templateId,
CallbackURL: callbackURL,
}
} else if templateId != "" || callbackURL != "" {
log.Printf("warning: both --template-id and --callback-url must be provided to enable the CI trigger; trigger is disabled")
}
No description provided.